We stand firmly against injustice in all its forms. Nothing can justify the current war crimes committed by Israel in occupied Palestine. Equally, nothing can excuse the continued support offered by other nations to this apartheid regime. If you believe in human rights, dignity, and justice, then we urge you to boycott this rogue state. Silence is complicity, do what’s right.
They shone with hope and joy, each in their own way Gaza’s children as they were in life: photographic tributes found on the web
This video shows, along with their name and age, some of the many children killed since Oct 7 in Gaza, drawing on pictorial tributes from their… pic.twitter.com/3vyBAYX6hF
(Scene: A quiet, moonlit night in a devastated Palestinian street. Mo’ath Amarnih, newly released from an Israeli prison, sits on a crumbling wall. His face is gaunt, his body frail, and his prosthetic eye reflects the dim glow of the streetlights. He shivers, not from the cold, but from the memories that refuse to leave him. Handala, the eternal 10-year-old Palestinian boy with his back turned, appears beside him, silent but listening.)
Handala:(softly) Mo’ath, you made it out.
Mo’ath:(bitter chuckle) Out? Am I out, Handala? My body walks these streets, but my soul is still shackled in that cell. I still feel the chains on my wrists, the boots on my ribs, the hunger gnawing at my insides. I hear the screams—theirs and mine.
Handala: I have seen many leave, but they never truly escape. They carry the prison with them. What did they do to you?
Mo’ath: What didn’t they do? They starved us, beat us until our bones felt like dust. They stripped us of our dignity, of our names, of our very humanity. They made us drink water from toilets like animals. They laughed as they smeared our wounds with dirt, as they watched our bodies shrivel. And when the scabies spread, they let it fester, let us scratch until we bled.
Handala: They think they can break you.
Mo’ath:(looking away) They have. My mother wept when she saw me, but I couldn’t even let her touch me. “Stay away,” I told her. I don’t know what filth they left inside me, what disease still crawls beneath my skin. Do you know what it feels like to fear your own mother’s embrace?
Handala: I know what it means to be robbed of love, to be turned into a shadow of yourself.
Mo’ath: They did worse than just starve us. They laughed as they tortured us. They violated us in ways I cannot speak of. Grown men wept like children, praying for death that never came. And they watched. They enjoyed it, Handala. They enjoyed it.
(Silence. The wind carries the distant sound of gunfire. Mo’ath closes his eyes, trying to push the memories away.)
Handala: They think pain will make you forget why you fight.
Mo’ath:(whispers) But it only carves it deeper into my bones.
Handala: And yet, you still speak. You still stand.
Mo’ath: What choice do I have? If I stay silent, they win. If I give up, they win. So I speak, even if my voice shakes. I walk, even if my legs barely hold me. But Handala… I am so tired.
Handala: You are tired, but you are not alone.
Mo’ath: Then tell me, Handala… when does it end?
Handala: When the land is free, when the prisoners return home without shackles, when the children no longer have to carry their fathers’ burdens.
Mo’ath: Will I live to see it?
Handala:(pauses) I don’t know. But even if you don’t, your voice will. Your suffering will not be forgotten.
Mo’ath: Then promise me one thing.
Handala: Anything.
Mo’ath: Never stop turning your back on this world until it finally sees us. Until it finally listens.
Handala:(nods) I never have. And I never will.
(Mo’ath exhales, a breath that feels like the weight of centuries. The night stretches on, but somewhere in the darkness, a new dawn waits.)
Racism is universally condemned, but antisemitism “uniqueness” debate has become sterile and constitutes an “intellectual terrorism”. The question is why? Does suffering from racism have universal or unique feelings?
In contemporary society, racism remains a pervasive and deeply ingrained issue that continues to shape individual experiences, societal structures, and global dynamics. While the concept of racism is widely acknowledged, its uniqueness lies in its multifaceted nature, encompassing historical, cultural, institutional, and individual dimensions. Understanding the complexity of racism requires a nuanced examination of its various manifestations and impacts across different contexts.
One distinctive aspect of racism is its historical roots, which span centuries and have influenced the development of societies worldwide. From colonialism and slavery to apartheid, theft of land, illegal settlements and segregation, the legacies of these oppressive systems continue to shape social hierarchies, power dynamics, and intergroup relations. The enduring effects of historical injustices underscore the interconnectedness of past and present forms of racism, highlighting the need for acknowledgment, reconciliation, and reparative actions to achieve freedom, justice and peace.
Furthermore, racism manifests differently across diverse cultural, ethnic, and national contexts, reflecting unique historical, political, and social dynamics. While overt forms of racism, such as explicit discrimination and hate crimes, are widely condemned, subtler manifestations persist in the form of systemic inequalities, microaggressions, and unconscious biases. These covert expressions of racism often perpetuate structural barriers and reinforce existing power imbalances, making them challenging to identify and address.
Moreover, racism operates at both the institutional and individual levels, influencing policies, practices, and attitudes within various social institutions. Institutions such as education, healthcare, criminal justice, and employment often reflect and perpetuate racial disparities, resulting in unequal access to opportunities, resources, and services for marginalized groups. Concurrently, individual attitudes and beliefs about race shape interpersonal interactions, perceptions, and behaviors, contributing to the reproduction of racial stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination.
The uniqueness of racism also lies in its intersectionality, as it intersects with other forms of oppression, including sexism, classism, ableism, and homophobia. Individuals who belong to multiple marginalized groups often experience compounded forms of discrimination, amplifying their vulnerability and limiting their access to social, economic, and political opportunities. Intersectional approaches to combating racism recognize the interconnected nature of oppression and advocate for inclusive strategies that address the intersecting dimensions of identity and inequality.
In confronting the uniqueness of racism, efforts to dismantle systemic racism require a comprehensive and multifaceted approach that addresses its root causes, structural dynamics, and intersecting inequalities. This includes implementing anti-racist policies, promoting diversity and inclusion, fostering intercultural understanding, and challenging institutionalized forms of discrimination and above all ending oppression, theft and occupation of others’ land.
Additionally, fostering empathy, allyship, and solidarity across racial and ethnic lines is essential for building collective resistance against racism and advancing social justice.
Recognizing the uniqueness of racism requires acknowledging its complexity, diversity, and enduring impact on individuals, communities, and societies. By confronting racism in all its forms and dimensions, we can work towards creating a more equitable, inclusive, and just world for all future generations without exemption.
On the hand, the exploitation of the concept of the “uniqueness of racism” by certain groups to perpetuate discrimination against other minorities is often regarded as a form of bullying and intellectual terrorism. This manipulation can lead to the intimidation of individuals, risking their employment and stifling their ability to speak out against apartheid, discrimination, injustice, and the fight for freedom.
Discussing the truth about Israeli atrocities in Gaza should be welcomed, respected, and supported as a means to aid the oppressed and hold perpetrators of genocide accountable. Exposing these truths should not be met with punishment or labeled as antisemitism or extremism.
A distinctly Palestinian black-and-white chequered piece of cloth, the keffiyeh is described by some as the nation’s unofficial flag. Long synonymous with the Palestinian cause, the simple square-metre fabric, traditionally folded diagonally into a triangle and worn draped over the head of rural Palestinian men, is today securely fashioned around the necks of human rights activists, anti-war protesters, sports stars and celebrities; transcending gender, religion and nationality. To read more, follow the link:
The Israeli regime enacts in all the territory it contols (Israeli sovereign territory, East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip) an apartheid regime. One organizing principle lies at the base of a wide array of Israeli policies: advancing and perpetuating the supremacy of one group – Jews – over another – Palestinians.
B’Tselem rejects the perception of Israel as a democracy (inside the Green Line) that simultaneously upholds a temporary military occupation (beyond it). B’Tselem reached the conclusion that the bar for defining the Israeli regime as an apartheid regime has been met after considering the accumulation of policies and laws that Israel devised to entrench its control over Palestinians.
The key tool Israel uses to implement the principle of Jewish supremacy is engineering space geographically, demographically and politically. Jews go about their lives in a single, contiguous space where they enjoy full rights and self-determination. In contrast, Palestinians live in a space that is fragmented into several units, each with a different set of rights – given or denied by Israel, but always inferior to the rights accorded to Jews.
The Israeli regime pursues this organizing principle in four major areas:
Land – Israel works to Judaize the entire area, treating land as a resource chiefly meant to benefit the Jewish population. Since 1948, Israel has taken over 90% of the land within the Green Line and built hundreds of communities for the Jewish population. Since 1967, Israel has also enacted this policy in the West Bank, building more than 280 settlements for some 600,000 Jewish Israeli citizens. Israel has not built a single community for the Palestinian population in the entire area stretching from the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River (with the exception of several communities built to concentrate the Bedouin population after dispossessing them of most of their property rights).
Citizenship – Jews living anywhere in the world, their children and grandchildren – and their spouses – are entitled to Israeli citizenship. In contrast, Palestinians cannot immigrate to Israeli-controlled areas, even if they, their parents or their grandparents were born and lived there. Israel makes it difficult for Palestinians who live in one of the units it controls to obtain status in another, and has enacted legislation that prohibits granting Palestinians who marry Israelis status within the Green Line.
Freedom of movement – Israeli citizens enjoy freedom of movement in the entire area controlled by Israel (with the exception of the Gaza Strip) and may enter and leave the country freely. Palestinian subjects, on the other hand, require a special Israeli-issued permit to travel between the units (and sometimes inside them), and exit abroad also requires Israeli approval.
Political participation – Palestinian citizens of Israel may vote and run for office, but leading politicians consistently undermine the legitimacy of Palestinian political representatives. The roughly five million Palestinians who live in the Occupied Territories, including East Jerusalem, cannot participate in the political system that governs their lives and determines their future. They are denied other political rights as well, including freedom of speech and association.
In the entire area, control over these aspects of life lies entirely in Israel’s hands – the sole power determining the population registry; land allocation; voter rolls; and the right (or denial thereof) to travel within, enter or exit any part of the area. The Israeli regime has grown increasingly explicit regarding its Jewish supremacist ideology, a process that has seen two major unmasking milestones in recent years. One was the enactment of Basic Law: Israel – the Nation State of the Jewish People, which declares the distinction between Jews and non-Jews fundamental and legitimate, and permits institutional discrimination in land management and development, housing, citizenship, language and culture. The second came in the form of official statements regarding formal annexation of more parts of the West Bank, attesting to Israel’s long-term intentions and debunking claims of “temporary occupation.”
B’Tselem stresses that the military occupation has not ended: Palestinians in the West Bank remain its direct subjects, while in the Gaza Strip they live under its effective control, exerted from the outside. At the same time, casting Israel as a “democracy” on one side of the Green Line, while it is “temporarily” occupying millions of people on the other side, is divorced from reality. This depiction ignores the fact that this state of affairs has been in place for over fifty years. It fails to take into consideration the hundreds of thousands of Jewish settlers living east of the Green Line. It glosses over the de-jure annexation of East Jerusalem and the de-facto annexation of the rest of the West Bank. These facts lead to the conclusion that these are not two parallel regimes, but a single one, governing the entire area and all the people living in it.
B’Tselem’s Executive Director, Hagai El-Ad: “The fundamental tenets of Israel’s regime, although already implemented for many years, have recently grown more explicit. This happened both with the discussion of de jure annexation after decades of de facto annexation, and with the enactment of the Nation State Basic Law, which took the existing discrimination against Palestinians and turned it into an open constitutional principle. Israel is not a democracy that has a temporary occupation attached to it: it is one regime between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, and we must look at the full picture and see it for what it is: apartheid. This sobering look at reality need not lead to despair, but quite the opposite. It is a call for change. After all, people created this regime, and people can change it.”
Amidst the war crimes in Gaza, disturbing reports have surfaced, shedding light on the illicit and morally reprehensible activities of the Israeli occupation forces (IOF). Over the last three months, an estimated $25 million in money and gold artifacts have been unlawfully stolen by Israeli soldiers. The looting has extended beyond the looting of Gazans’ homes, reaching appalling incidents at checkpoints, particularly on Salah Al-Din Street. At these locations, Gazans have been forcibly stripped of their valuable possessions, as recounted by numerous testimonies that depict a blatant disregard for ethical standards.
Even homes evacuated under orders were not spared from these despicable actions, with Israeli soldiers shamelessly capturing souvenir photos and videos of their crimes, further intensifying the anguish of the affected Gazans. The gravity of these actions has been underscored by the Media Office in Gaza, citing documented cases in Israeli newspapers and labeling these actions as a systematic theft of the money belonging to the people of Gaza.
These unethical and deplorable actions not only lay bare the criminal mentality and moral decay of the Israeli occupation but also constitute a blatant violation of international laws governing the conduct of armed forces. The depth of moral failure inherent in these acts of looting, particularly from displaced and vulnerable populations, starkly contradicts the principles of humanitarianism and the protection of civilians in times of conflict.
As the international community closely scrutinizes these developments, there is a growing demand for an impartial investigation into these unconscionable actions. This condemnable behavior warrants global attention, and the perpetrators must be held accountable for their egregious transgressions against the people of Gaza.
