Hind Rajab’s death has already been forgotten. That’s exactly what Israel wants

The Israeli state has applied its usual strategy after this atrocity: deny, deflect, deceive, and wait for attention to move elsewhere

By Owen Jones, Sun 18 Aug 2024

Source

If you are ever in doubt about the nature of Israel’s onslaught against Gaza, remember this little girl. Hind Rajab was a five-year-old Palestinian with an adorable smile. On the morning of 29 January, she got in a Kia Picanto along with her aunt, uncle and several cousins. They were seeking to flee the Tel al-Hawa neighbourhood of Gaza City. The Israeli military fired on the car, killing everyone inside except for Hind and her 15-year-old cousin, Layan. A terrified Layan answered a call from the Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS), informing them that a tank was firing on the car: in the recording, you hear her tortured screams as she is shot dead. When the PRCS rang back, Hind answered, now the only survivor, surrounded by the bloodied corpses of her six relatives. She also referred to a tank and begged to be rescued. At one point she told the operator it was getting dark and that she was scared.

After hours waiting for permission, the ministry of health negotiated safe access with the Israeli authorities for an ambulance. The paramedics arrived at about 6pm and were shot upon arrival. Two weeks later, their remains were recovered – along with the decomposed bodies of Hind and her family.

After each atrocity it perpetrates, the Israeli state has a standard modus operandi: deny, deflect, deceive, and wait for attention to move elsewhere. Most media outlets have collaborated with this strategy, which has allowed Israel to continue its genocidal onslaught, because it prevents observers from joining the dots to understand what this really is. For this reason, every crime must be revisited until it is properly understood. In this case, Israel claimed they had no troops in the area.

Nearly five months after the killings, Forensic Architecture – an acclaimed multidisciplinary research group based at Goldsmiths, University of London, published a detailed investigation in conjunction with Al Jazeera. They mapped 335 bullet holes in the car’s exterior. Analysis of Layan’s phone call found 64 gunshots fired in just six seconds, consistent only with Israeli-issued weaponry, with the tank estimated to bebetween 13 and 23 metres away from the car. “At such proximity,” they write, “it is not plausible that the shooter could not have seen that the car was occupied by civilians, including children.”

Wreckage of the ambulance in which two crew were killed who had gone to rescue Hind Rajab. Photograph: Reuters

Listen to the testimonies of these dead children, read the detailed research, and you cannot but conclude that these killings were deliberate. It was broad daylight, an Israeli tank was close to the car, at least 335 bullets were fired over an extended period, and then the ambulance – whose passage was coordinated with Israel’s authorities – was blown apart. If this one atrocity had been committed by Hamas militants on 7 October, it would be repeatedly and specifically highlighted as evidence of the utter barbarism of the enemy. That has not happened here.

Israel’s modus operandi can be seen in action time and time again. When the Palestinian-American Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh was killed in May 2022, Israel denied responsibility, pointing the finger at Palestinian militants, waiting for months until attention had moved elsewhere before acknowledging its likely responsibility. When Israel assaulted what had been Gaza’s main medical facility, al-Shifa hospital, last November, over a month later the Washington Post discredited its key claims, suggesting a lack of evidence that the hospital was used as a “command and control centre” or that tunnels could be accessed from hospital wards. Nearly six weeks after more than 100 Palestinians were massacred while waiting for aid in the so-called Flour Massacre in February, CNN discredited Israeli disavowals of responsibility. We could go on.

These detailed rebuttals of Israeli claims reveal a pattern of atrocities followed by cover-up – yet still media outlets treat initial Israeli claims as credible, where they would rightly pour scorn on similar claims by the Russian state.Palestinians voices are needed more than ever. But they are being silenced | Ahmad Ibsais

As Gaza’s official death toll passes 40,000 – including about 14,000 children – Israeli newspaper Haaretz points out that this represents a higher proportion of the prewar population killed in 10 months than were killed in the Iraq war over 20 years, or in the Yugoslav wars over 10 years; and it’s four times the proportion of people killed in Ukraine over two-and-a-half years. What’s more, this is likely a drastic underestimate: thousands buried under the rubble are excluded from official figures, as are indirect deaths – going by precedent, likely to end up the biggest killer – while the reporting system has virtually collapsed thanks to a destroyed healthcare apparatus. Other estimates by medical experts range from 92,000 to 186,000.https://a2fcb001dca1a834208dc7beef3128f0.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html?n=0

If a state not allied to the west were guilty of this, there would not only be a consensus that it represents one of the gravest crimes of our age, it would be regarded as morally indecent not to think so. Those who respond by deflecting to undeniable atrocities committed on 7 October not only reveal their total disregard for Palestinian life, but their lack of understanding of the normal dynamics of genocides, which are invariably justified by atrocities committed by an enemy. Many are aware that the 1994 Rwandan genocide involved Hutu extremists slaughtering the Tutsis: how many know this slaughter was justified by the perpetrators because of a civil war begun by Tutsi rebels invading from Uganda four years earlier, committing multiple war crimes as they did so?

If Israel’s conduct in its war on Gaza was understood for what it is – an abomination perpetrated by a murderous regime – powerful figures would fear consequences. Those who cheered it on would fear being permanently branded as monsters. Those who stayed silent, empty platitudes and handwringing aside, would fear accountability. Until this happens, the horrors will not end. So if you are ever in doubt about what this really is, think back to the final, terrified moments of Hind Rajab, a five-year-old girl with an adorable smile

Posted in Gaza, Hind Rajab, Owen Jones, UK | Tagged , | Comments Off on Hind Rajab’s death has already been forgotten. That’s exactly what Israel wants

In Jerusalem by Mahmoud Darwish

In Jerusalem, and I mean within the ancient walls, 
I walk from one epoch to another without a memory 
to guide me. The prophets over there are sharing 
the history of the holy ... ascending to heaven 
and returning less discouraged and melancholy, because love 
and peace are holy and are coming to town.
I was walking down a slope and thinking to myself: How 
do the narrators disagree over what light said about a stone? 
Is it from a dimly lit stone that wars flare up?
I walk in my sleep. I stare in my sleep. I see 
no one behind me. I see no one ahead of me. 
All this light is for me. I walk. I become lighter. I fly 
then I become another. Transfigured. Words
sprout like grass from Isaiah's messenger 
mouth: "If you don't believe you won't be safe." 
I walk as if I were another. And my wound a white 
biblical rose. And my hands like two doves 
on the cross hovering and carrying the earth. 
I don't walk, I fly, I become another, 
transfigured. No place and no time. So who am I? 
I am no I in ascension's presence. But I 
think to myself: Alone, the prophet Muhammad 
spoke classical Arabic. "And then what?" 
Then what? A woman soldier shouted: 
Is that you again? Didn't I kill you? 
I said: You killed me ... and I forgot, like you, to die.
Posted in Mahmoud Darwish, Palestinian art & culture | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Trump’s Condom Crisis

Phalapoem editor, 30/01/25

Trump spoke with wisdom, or so he believed—
Fifty million for Gaza? Oh no, he’s aggrieved!
Not for the starving, the sick, or the dead,
But for condoms—yes, that’s what he said!

In ruins and rubble, with futures so bleak,
He thinks boys are worried about getting some cheek?
While bombs keep falling, destruction is vast,
Trump’s greatest fear? Gaza’s boys having a blast!
Posted in Gaza, Palestinian art & culture, Phalapoem editor | Tagged , | Comments Off on Trump’s Condom Crisis

The Prison Cell

By Mahmoud Darwish


It is possible…
It is possible at least sometimes…
It is possible especially now
To ride a horse
Inside a prison cell
And run away…

It is possible for prison walls
To disappear,
For the cell to become a distant land
Without frontiers:

What did you do with the walls?
I gave them back to the rocks.
And what did you do with the ceiling?
I turned it into a saddle.
And your chain?
I turned it into a pencil.

The prison guard got angry.
He put an end to my dialogue.
He said he didn't care for poetry,
And bolted the door of my cell.

He came back to see me
In the morning,
He shouted at me:

Where did all this water come from?
I brought it from the Nile.
And the trees?
From the orchards of Damascus.
And the music?
From my heartbeat.

The prison guard got mad;
He put an end to my dialogue.
He said he didn't like my poetry,
And bolted the door of my cell.

But he returned in the evening:

Where did this moon come from?
From the nights of Baghdad.
And the wine?
From the vineyards of Algiers.
And this freedom?
From the chain you tied me with last night.

The prison guard grew so sad…
He begged me to give him back
His freedom
Posted in Evidence of Israeli Fascism and Nazism and Genocide, Justice, Mahmoud Darwish, News from the apartheid, Palestinian art & culture | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Prison Cell

Live-Streamed Genocide

Watch

Posted in Gaza, Videos | Tagged | Comments Off on Live-Streamed Genocide

Banksy’s Gallery, Manchester 2023

Use slideshow to see more

Posted in Banksy, Media | Tagged | 1 Comment

ICJ Ruling: Israel Must Stop Genocide

Trita Parsi

Pro-Palestinian activists wave flags during session of the International Court of Justice, or World Court, in The Hague, Netherlands, Friday, Jan. 26, 2024. Israel is set to hear whether the United Nations’ top court will order it to end its military offensive in Gaza during a case filed by South Africa accusing Israel of genocide. (AP Photo/Patrick Post)

The ICJ just ruled against Israel and determined that South Africa successfully argued that Israel’s conduct plausibly could constitute genocide. The Court imposes several injunctions against Israel and reminds Israel that its rulings are binding, according to international law. A final ruling will still take more time, but this ruling will have significant political repercussions. Here are a few thoughts.

This is a devastating blow to Israel’s global standing. To put it in context, Israel has worked ferociously for the last two decades to defeat the BDS movement – Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions – not because it will have a significant economic impact on Israel, but because of the manner that it could delegitimize Israel internationally. However, the ruling of the ICJ that Israel is plausibly engaged in genocide is far more devastating to Israel’s legitimacy than anything BDS could have achieved.

Just as much as Israel’s political system has publicly been increasingly associated with apartheid in the past few years, following groundbreaking reports by major human rights organizations such as Amnesty, Israel will now increasingly be publicly associated with genocide – as will likely those countries that have supported Israel and its military campaign in Gaza, such as the US under Biden.

The implications for the United States, as a result, are also significant. Firstly because the court does not have the ability to implement its ruling. Instead, the matter will go to the Security Council, where the Biden administration will once again face the choice of protecting Israel politically by casting a veto, and by that, further isolate the United States, or to allow the Security Council to act and pay a domestic political cost for “not standing by Israel.”

So far, the Biden administration has refused to say if it will respect ICJ’s decision. Of course, in previous cases in front of the ICJ, such as Myanmar, Ukraine & Syria, the US and Western states stressed that ICJ provisional measures are binding and must be fully implemented.

The double standards of US foreign policy will hit a new low if, in this case, Biden not only argues against the ICJ, but actively acts to prevent and block the implementation of its ruling. It is perhaps not surprising that senior Biden administration officials have largely ceased using the term “rules-based order” since October 7.

It also raises questions about how Biden’s policy of bear-hugging Israel may have contributed to Israel’s conduct in terms of genocide. Biden could have offered more measured support and pushed back hard against Israeli excesses – and by that, prevented Israel from engaging in actions that can fall under the category of genocide. But he didn’t.

Instead, Biden offered unconditional support combined with zero public criticism of Israel’s conduct and only limited push-back behind the scenes. A different American approach could have shaped Israel’s war efforts in a manner that arguably would not have been preliminarily ruled by the ICJ as plausibly meeting the standards of genocide.

This shows that America undermines its own interest as well as that of its partners when it offers them blank checks and complete and unquestionable protection. The absence of checks and balances such protection offers fuels reckless behavior all around. As such, Biden’s unconditional support may have undermined Israel, in the final analysis.

This ruling may also boost those arguing that they, as signatories of the Genocide Convention, have a positive obligation to prevent genocide. The Houthis, for instance, have justified their attacks against ships heading to Israeli ports in the Red Sea, citing this positive obligation. What legal implications will the court’s ruling have as a result on the US and UK’s military action against the Houthis?

The implications for Europe will also be considerable. The US is rather accustomed and comfortable setting aside international law and ignoring international institutions. Europe is not.

International law and institutions play a much more central role in European security thinking. The decision will continue to split Europe. But the fact that some key EU states will reject the ICJ’s ruling will profoundly contradict and undermine Europe’s broader security paradigm.

Final point: The mere application of South Africa’s application to the ICJ appears to have moderated Israel’s war conduct. Plans to ethically cleanse Gaza and send its residents to third countries appear to have been somewhat paused, presumably because of how such actions would boost South Africa’s application. If so, it shows that the Court, in an era where the force of international law is increasingly questioned, has had a greater impact in terms of deterring unlawful Israeli actions than anything the Biden administration has done.

Posted in Gaza, Justice | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Any doubts?

Posted in Media | Tagged | Comments Off on Any doubts?

Netanyahu’s Reign of Cruelty: A Leader Who Celebrates Palestinian Suffering and Embodies Western Hypocrisy

Phalapoem editor, 27/01/2025

Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving Prime Minister, has become a symbol of the relentless oppression and dehumanization of the Palestinian people. His policies and rhetoric reveal a disturbing indifference—if not outright celebration—of Palestinian suffering, while his alignment with certain Western leaders like Biden, Trump , Schultz and Starmer underscores a shared disregard for justice, human rights, and international law. To many, Netanyahu’s actions and words reflect not just political strategy, but a deeply troubling psychological disposition that thrives on the pain of others.

A Legacy of Brutality

Netanyahu’s tenure has been marked by an escalation of violence and systemic oppression against Palestinians. From the expansion of illegal settlements in the West Bank to the devastating military assaults on Gaza, his policies have inflicted immeasurable suffering on millions of people. Under his leadership, Israel has tightened its blockade on Gaza, turning it into an uninhabitable prison where 2.3 million Palestinians struggle to survive amidst poverty, unemployment, and crumbling infrastructure.

Netanyahu’s government has also normalized the use of excessive force against Palestinian civilians, including during the Great March of Return protests in 2018, where Israeli snipers killed over 200 unarmed demonstrators, including children, journalists, and medical workers. His response to such atrocities has been chillingly dismissive, often framing these actions as necessary for Israel’s security while ignoring the blatant violations of human rights.

Celebrating Suffering

What sets Netanyahu apart is not just his policies, but his apparent glee in the suffering of Palestinians. He has repeatedly used dehumanizing language to describe Palestinians, referring to them as threats to be neutralized rather than as human beings with inherent rights. His government has celebrated gaza genocide that result in massive civilian casualties, often framing them as “successes” while ignoring the humanitarian cost.

In 2021, during the brutal 11-day assault on Gaza that killed over 250 Palestinians, including 66 children, Netanyahu boasted about the “achievements” of the operation, calling it a “great success.” His rhetoric revealed a callous disregard for the lives lost and the families torn apart. For Netanyahu, Palestinian suffering is not a tragedy—it is a political tool, a means to consolidate power and rally support from hardline factions.

Shared Values with Western Leaders

Netanyahu’s alignment with certain Western leaders highlights a disturbing trend: the normalization of cruelty and the abandonment of human rights in favor of political expediency. Leaders like U.S. President Biden and Trump and others have embraced Netanyahu’s agenda, offering unwavering support for his policies while turning a blind eye to the atrocities committed against Palestinians.

Trump’s so-called “Peace Plan,” crafted in collaboration with Netanyahu, was a blatant attempt to legitimize Israeli annexation of Palestinian land and deny Palestinians their basic rights. Similarly, some European leaders have prioritized economic and political ties with Israel over holding it accountable for its violations of international law. This complicity has emboldened Netanyahu, allowing him to continue his oppressive policies with impunity.

A Psychopathic Disposition

Netanyahu’s actions and rhetoric raise troubling questions about his psychological disposition. His ability to celebrate the suffering of others, his lack of empathy for the victims of his policies, and his relentless pursuit of power at any cost are hallmarks of a deeply troubling mindset. Psychopathy, characterized by a lack of remorse, manipulative behavior, and a disregard for the rights of others, seems to resonate with Netanyahu’s approach to governance.

His willingness to sacrifice human lives for political gain, his exploitation of fear and division, and his refusal to acknowledge the humanity of Palestinians all point to a leader who is not just ruthless, but fundamentally detached from the moral principles that should guide political leadership. He has never described his neighbours as Palestinians but referred  to them as Arabs. 

Netanyahu’s reign has been a dark chapter in the history of the Israeli occupation of Palestine, marked by violence, oppression, and a blatant disregard for human rights. His alignment with Western leaders who share his values of cruelty and hypocrisy has only deepened the suffering of the Palestinian people.

The international community must no longer turn a blind eye to Netanyahu’s actions. It is time to hold him accountable for the genocide, starvation and ethnic cleansing  committed under his leadership, to demand an end to the apartheid polices, occupation and the blockade, and to work toward a future where justice, equality, and human rights are upheld for all.

Benjamin Netanyahu’s legacy is one of cruelty and injustice. His celebration of Palestinian suffering and his alignment with Western leaders who share his disregard for human rights reveal a leader who is not just politically dangerous, but morally bankrupt. The world must recognize the urgency of this moment and take a stand against the oppression of the Palestinian people. Only through accountability, solidarity, and a commitment to justice can we hope to end Israeli  violence and build a future where all people can live in dignity and peace.

Posted in News from the apartheid, Palestinian history, Phalapoem editor, UK, USA | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Netanyahu’s Reign of Cruelty: A Leader Who Celebrates Palestinian Suffering and Embodies Western Hypocrisy

A Tale of Two Returns: Palestinians and Israeli Settlers

Phalapoem editor, 27/01/2025

The stark contrast between the return narratives of Palestinians and Israeli settlers offers a window into the deep inequalities and injustices underpinning the ongoing Israeli occupation. While Palestinians continue to live in the shadow of destruction, displacement, inhumane checkpoints, separation wall, and denial of their right to return to their homes, Israeli settlers are afforded the luxury of returning to Europe  leaving behind intact homes, even as a genocidal assault unfolds in Gaza. This comparison highlights the systemic disparities in rights, agency, and humanity afforded to both groups living in Israeli apartheid.

Palestinians: A Right to Return Denied

For Palestinians, the right to return is a cornerstone of their struggle. Since the Nakba (the Catastrophe) in 1948, when over 750,000 Palestinians were forcibly displaced, millions of Palestinian refugees and their descendants have been denied the right to return to their homes, despite this being enshrined in international law. Today, as Israeli bombs decimate Gaza, countless Palestinians face renewed displacement, many losing their homes for the second or third time.

Even when the immediate violence subsides, the idea of return remains a distant dream for most Palestinians. Israeli racist policies systematically prevent Palestinians from reclaiming their homes and lands, often replacing them with illegal settlements or military zones. The destroyed homes in Gaza, the West Bank, and historic Palestine are not merely the result of war but a deliberate and apartheid strategy of erasure, ensuring that Palestinians remain stateless and displaced.

Israeli Settlers: The Privilege of Return

In sharp contrast, Israeli settlers—many of whom are recent arrivals to the region—enjoy the privilege of dual or even multiple citizenships. As the world witnesses the Israeli army’s genocidal campaign in Gaza, some settlers have chosen to return to Europe, citing safety concerns. Their homes in Israel remain intact, untouched by the violence they often support or enable, yet their departure is met with understanding and facilitated by international networks that prioritize their comfort and security.

This privilege reflects the broader reality of the Israeli settler-colonial project: settlers can return to ancestral or adopted homelands in Europe or elsewhere, while Palestinians, whose ties to the land span generations, are denied the same right. The settlers’ mobility is a testament to the systems of power and privilege that sustain the occupation, allowing them to move freely while Palestinians remain trapped under siege or in exile.

The stark disparity in the treatment of Palestinians and Israeli settlers underscores the deeply political nature of the “right to return.” For Palestinians, it is a matter of justice, rooted in historical ties to the land and recognized by UN Resolution 194. For Israeli settlers, return is a choice, not a necessity, enabled by the same structures that deny Palestinians their basic rights.

This disparity also reflects the broader dynamics of dehumanization. Palestinians, portrayed as threats or burdens, are denied the right to rebuild their lives. Meanwhile, Israeli settlers, often seen as agents of a “civilising ” project, are afforded every opportunity to thrive, even if it means leaving their supposed homeland behind.

The ongoing genocide in Gaza further highlights the hypocrisy of these dynamics. As tens of thousands of Palestinians are killed or displaced, their calls for justice are met with indifference or outright hostility from western governments. Meanwhile, the international community quietly enables the mobility and safety of Israeli settlers, even as they benefit from or support policies that perpetuate Palestinian suffering.

This hypocrisy is most evident in the framing of the occupation. Palestinian refugees are often depicted as eternal victims or security threats, while Israeli settlers are portrayed as pioneers or victims of anti-Semitism when they choose to return to Europe. The global narrative reinforces the idea that some lives are worth protecting, while others are expendable.

The comparison between the return of Palestinians to their destroyed homes and the return of Israeli settlers to Europe exposes the profound injustices at the heart of the Israeli occupation. It is a tale of two returns: one denied by systemic violence and oppression, and the other enabled by privilege and international complicity.

For Palestinians, the right to return is not just a legal principle but a symbol of their enduring connection to the land and their resilience in the face of displacement. For Israeli settlers, the ability to leave their homes intact underscores the colonial nature of the occupation, where the land is treated as a temporary asset rather than a shared homeland.

Until these disparities are addressed and the right to return is universally recognized, the cycle of displacement and inequality will persist, denying justice and peace to millions of Palestinians.

Posted in Gaza, Justice, Massacres & genocides, News from the apartheid, Palestinian art & culture, Phalapoem editor | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Tale of Two Returns: Palestinians and Israeli Settlers