We stand firmly against injustice in all its forms. Nothing can justify the current war crimes committed by Israel in occupied Palestine. Equally, nothing can excuse the continued support offered by other nations to this apartheid regime. If you believe in human rights, dignity, and justice, then we urge you to boycott this rogue state. Silence is complicity, do what’s right.
The Holocaust, particularly the atrocities committed in Auschwitz (Oświęcim), remains one of the most horrifying examples of human suffering and genocide in history. Millions of Jews, along with Roma, Polish people political prisoners, and others, were systematically exterminated by the Nazi regime in a campaign of industrialized murder. Today, as the world witnesses the destruction in Gaza by the apartheid entity of Israel , many draw parallels between the two tragedies, noting the shared elements of destruction, dehumanization, and immense human suffering.
While the contexts and scales of these events differ, comparing them is not an exercise in diminishing the suffering of one group but rather an attempt to highlight how patterns of systemic violence and oppression repeat across history.
Destruction of Human Life• Oświęcim (Auschwitz):
Auschwitz became the epicenter of Nazi brutality, where over a million people, primarily Jews, were killed in gas chambers, through starvation, forced labor, and medical experiments. This systematic extermination was designed to erase an entire group of people based on their ethnicity and religion. Victims were stripped of their humanity, treated as numbers, and denied their most basic rights.
• Gaza:
In Gaza, Palestinians face relentless bombardments by Israeli occupation forces , ethnic cleansing , and blockades of food, medicine and water that create a humanitarian catastrophe and Israeli-made starvation . Over the years, tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians have been killed, including women and children, with entire families wiped out in discriminate strikes by Israeli troops . The deliberate Israeli destruction of homes, schools, universities, mosques, churches, hospitals, and basic infrastructure has left Gazans with little to no means of survival, effectively rendering them prisoners in their own land. According to Amnesty International, the Israeli intent was meant to be a systematic extermination of a group of people and the result is evident as mass death, widespread trauma, and the slow erasure of a people which constitutes a genocide.
Dehumanization
• Oświęcim:
The Holocaust relied on extreme dehumanization, where Jews were portrayed as subhuman in Nazi propaganda, enabling their systematic annihilation. Stripped of their identities, tattooed with numbers, and herded into concentration camps, victims were treated as expendable objects rather than human beings.
• Gaza:
Palestinians in Gaza are similarly dehumanized by Israeli leaders including the Israeli president and in their media. Labeled as “terrorists” or animals or collateral damage, their lives are often portrayed as less valuable. This dehumanization fuels a global apathy that allows the ongoing Israeli blockade, bombing campaigns, and displacement to continue with minimal accountability. Palestinians, like Holocaust victims have reportedly been marked with numbers on their foreheads or hands, stripped of their dignity, and subjected to inhumane treatment. Moreover, they are frequently used as human shields during military operations, a practice that underscores the stripping away of their humanity and rights. These actions reflect a disturbing disregard for their identity, agency, and worth as human beings.
The Machinery of Destruction
• Oświęcim:
The Nazis developed a cold, calculated system to facilitate genocide: gas chambers, crematoria, and an entire infrastructure designed for mass murder. Auschwitz was not just a camp but a factory of death, where killing was industrialized and impersonal.
• Gaza:
In Gaza, destruction comes from advanced modern Israeli and American weaponry and airstrikes, but with a middle age siege tactics. Civilian areas are repeatedly targeted by Israeli forces , resulting in indiscriminate casualties, the vast majority of which are women and children. The israeli blockade, cutting off food, medical supplies, and other essentials, functions as a form of collective punishment, slowly suffocating the population. While the tools are different, the outcome—massive loss of life and suffering—is eerily similar.
Human Suffering and Trauma
• Oświęcim:
The Holocaust left survivors scarred for life, carrying the weight of unimaginable loss and trauma. Entire families and communities were eradicated, leaving a void that could never be filled. Survivors lived with the constant pain of witnessing atrocities and losing loved ones in the most inhumane ways.
• Gaza:
The suffering in Gaza is similarly intergenerational. Children grow up amidst the rubble of their homes, living under the constant threat of violence. Families mourn the loss of loved ones, often unable to even bury their dead with dignity. The psychological toll of living under Israeli siege and witnessing death and destruction has left deep scars on the collective Palestinian psyche.
Global Complicity and Silence
• Oświęcim:
During the Holocaust, much of the world turned a blind eye, with many nations refusing to act until it was too late. The cries of those in Auschwitz went unanswered, allowing the genocide to continue unchecked.
• Gaza:
Today, Gaza faces a similar silence from much of the international community. Despite widespread and televised documentation of the genocide and destruction and pleas for intervention, political interests and alliances often take precedence over human rights. Just as the world failed to stop Auschwitz in time, it risks failing Gaza by allowing its suffering to continue.
Lessons Unlearned
Both Auschwitz and Gaza serve as stark reminders of what happens when humanity turns its back on oppression. While the Holocaust was a deliberate, systematic genocide on an unparalleled scale, the ongoing war on Gaza represents a modern iteration of genocide, ethnic cleansing , and dehumanization. The tools may have changed, but the suffering remains the same.
The world vowed “Never Again” after Auschwitz, but Gaza stands as a testament to humanity’s failure to uphold that promise. If we are to truly honor the memory of Holocaust victims, we must recognize and confront the suffering in Gaza—not as a comparison to diminish either tragedy but as a call to action to prevent history from repeating itself. Silence in the face of oppression, whether in Auschwitz or Gaza, makes us complicit in the suffering of others.
The concept of a “God-promised land” has been repeatedly invoked to justify the dispossession, oppression, and violence against Palestinians. Rooted in religious narratives, this claim has been weaponized to validate the establishment of the State of Israel and the subsequent displacement, ethnic cleansing, and systematic subjugation of the Palestinian people. However, when stripped of its theological veneer, the invocation of divine promises to justify colonialism and mass atrocities reveals itself as a dangerous ideology that undermines justice, human rights, and coexistence.
The “Promised Land” Narrative
The notion that the land of Palestine was divinely promised to the Jewish people originates from biblical texts, particularly the Hebrew Bible. According to these scriptures, God granted the land to Abraham and his descendants as an eternal inheritance. While this belief holds religious significance for many Jews, it is important to recognize that it is a theological claim, not a legal or historical mandate.
Using ancient religious texts to assert ownership over modern territories is a deeply problematic approach to geopolitics. If every religious group were to demand the restoration of lands based on scripture, the result would be endless conflict. Yet in the case of Palestine, this narrative has been weaponized to rationalize the ongoing displacement of Palestinians and the denial of their basic rights.
Weaponizing Religion to Justify Atrocities
The invocation of divine promises has been used to excuse some of the most egregious human rights violations in modern history, including:
1. Ethnic Cleansing: During the Nakba (1948), over 750,000 Palestinians were forcibly displaced from their homes to establish the State of Israel. Entire villages were destroyed, and the survivors were left stateless, exiled, and unable to return to their ancestral lands. This act of ethnic cleansing was justified by the claim that Jews were “returning” to a land that was “rightfully theirs.”
2. Military Occupation: For decades, the Israeli government has occupied Palestinian territories in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, enforcing an apartheid system of checkpoints, land confiscation, and restrictions on movement. These actions are often framed as part of a divine mission to reclaim the “Greater Israel.”
3. Settlement Expansion: Illegal Israeli settlements continue to grow across the West Bank, displacing Palestinian families and annexing land in direct violation of international law. The settlers and their supporters frequently cite religious entitlement as justification, turning sacred texts into tools of land theft and oppression.
4. Massacres and Bombardments: From the Sabra and Shatila massacre to the repeated bombings of Gaza, mass killings of Palestinians have been carried out under the guise of “defending the Jewish homeland.” These actions, often rationalized as security measures, are underpinned by a dehumanizing ideology that views Palestinian lives as expendable obstacles to a divine promise.
The Flawed Logic of Divine Justification
Using religious claims to justify modern state policies is inherently exclusionary and dangerous. It disregards the rights of those who do not share the same beliefs and reduces complex geopolitical issues to simplistic, absolutist dogma. Moreover, it erases the centuries-long history of coexistence between Jews, Christians, and Muslims in Palestine prior to the advent of Zionist nationalism.
The idea of a “God-promised land” also contradicts basic principles of justice and human rights. A just society cannot be built on the dispossession and suffering of another people. The ethical imperative to treat all humans with dignity and equality should outweigh any theological claim, particularly when such claims result in violence and oppression.
Palestinian Resistance and the Pursuit of Justice
For Palestinians, the land of Palestine is not just a religious or historical homeland—it is their birthplace, their livelihood, and their identity. The forced removal of Palestinians from their homes and the continued denial of their rights cannot be justified by ancient religious texts or nationalist ideologies. Palestinians are not obstacles to a promise; they are human beings deserving of justice, dignity, and self-determination.
The Way Forward
To move toward peace, the world must reject the use of religious narratives as justification for oppression. True reconciliation requires acknowledging the suffering inflicted on Palestinians and holding those responsible accountable for their actions. It also demands an end to the exploitation of theology as a tool for colonialism and violence.
Justice cannot be built on divine entitlement. It must be grounded in universal human rights, mutual respect, and the recognition of the inherent worth of all people. The promise of any land is meaningless if it comes at the expense of the lives and freedoms of those who already inhabit it.
• Attackers: Zionist forces-the 33rd Battalion of the “Alexandroni Brigade” in the Haganah.
• Casualty count: about 260.
June 13, 1948: The expulsion of Tantura women, children and elderly from Fureidis to Jordan. The Red Cross is supervising. (Beno Rothenberg collection, courtesy of the Israel State Archives. All rights reserved.)
Description of the event: In 1948, a tragic event known as the Al-Tantura Massacre happened. This occurred when a group called Zionist forces attacked a village, causing the deaths of 260 people, mainly women, children, and old folks. The attack forced the people of the village to leave, and they were mistreated. On the night of May 22-23, 1948, the Zionist forces, particularly the 33rd Battalion of the “Alexandroni Brigade” in the Haganah, attacked Al-Tantura. They quickly took control of the village, and around 1, 200 residents had to move to nearby villages. The Israeli army not only took over the village but also engaged in violent actions in the streets for hours. They even fired at the residents, including in the cemetery where the victims were buried. Later on, a parking lot was built on top of the mass grave, serving the “Dor” colony south of Haifa. Recently, a mass grave containing more than 200 bodies was discovered in the village of Tantura.
Teddy Katz’s research confirming the Al-Tantura Massacre: In the late 1990s, Teddy Katz’s University of Haifa master’s thesis confirmed that Israel committed mass murder in the 1948 Al-Tantura Massacre. Based on 140 hours of interviews with 135 witnesses, half Jewish and half Arab, the thesis went unnoticed until Maariv published it in 2000. Veterans of the accused IOF( Israeli Occupation Force) unit sued Katz for defamation, leading to a case dismissal without hearing his tapes. Katz signed a retraction under pressure, resulting in the university revoking his degree.
References:
[1] Elmusa, Sharif S.; Khalidi, Muhammad Ali (1992). All that Remains: The Palestinian Villages Occupied and Depopulated by Israel in 1948. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Palestine Studies. ISBN 978-0-88728-224-9.
[2] Kamel, Lorenzo (2010). “The Tantura Affaire”. Oriente Moderno. 90 (2): 397–410. doi:10.1163/22138617-09002007. JSTOR 23253467.
[3] Khader, Jamil (2008). “After Tantura/after Auschwitz: Trauma, postcoloniality and the (un)writing of the Nakbah in the documentary film Paradise Lost”. Journal of Postcolonial Writing. 44 (4): 355–365. doi:10.1080/17449850802410473. S2CID 145118253.
[4] The Guardian. (2023, May 25). “Study on 1948 Israeli Massacre in Tantura Reveals Palestinian Village Mass Graves Under Car Park.” Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/may/25/study-1948-israeli-massacre-tantura-palestinian-village-mass-graves-car-park
[5] Palumbo, Michael. The Palestinian Catastrophe: The 1948 Expulsion of a People from Their Homeland. London: Faber & Faber, 1987.
[6] Muslih, Nour al-Din. “Expelling the Palestinians: The Concept of ‘Transfer’ in Zionist Thought and Planning, 1882 – 1948.” Beirut: Institute for Palestine Studies, 1992.
For decades, the United States has wielded its veto power in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to shield Israel from accountability and obstruct justice for Palestinians. This pattern of vetoes, often in response to resolutions condemning Israeli actions or supporting Palestinian rights, has played a significant role in prolonging the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and enabling Israel’s continued violations of international law.
Since 1972, the U.S. has used its veto power more than 50 times on issues related to Israel and Palestine. These vetoes have blocked resolutions that addressed critical issues, including illegal settlements in the West Bank, military aggression in Gaza, and the recognition of Palestinian statehood. Each veto represents not just a vote against the resolution itself but a broader message of complicity and indifference toward Palestinian suffering.
Examples of Notable U.S. Vetoes
1. 1982: Condemning Israel’s Invasion of Lebanon
The U.S. vetoed a resolution condemning Israel’s invasion of Lebanon and its targeting of Palestinian refugees in the Sabra and Shatila massacres. The veto effectively excused acts of mass violence and reinforced Israel’s impunity on the international stage.
2. 2011: Condemning Israeli Settlements
A UNSC resolution declaring Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal and demanding a halt to their expansion was vetoed by the Obama administration. This veto came despite overwhelming international consensus and even criticism from U.S. allies. It signaled a refusal to challenge Israel’s expansionist policies, which remain a central obstacle to peace.
3. 2017: Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital
After President Trump unilaterally declared Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, the UNSC proposed a resolution rejecting this recognition. The U.S. vetoed the resolution, isolating itself internationally and undermining its role as a neutral broker in the peace process.
The Impact of U.S. Vetoes
These vetoes have had far-reaching consequences:
• Undermining International Law: By blocking resolutions that call for Israel to adhere to international law, the U.S. has effectively allowed Israel to operate above the law. Illegal settlements, collective punishment, and the blockade of Gaza continue without meaningful consequences.
• Perpetuating Palestinian Oppression: The vetoes have denied Palestinians justice, accountability, and recognition on the world stage. They have emboldened Israel to pursue policies of displacement, land theft, and military aggression without fear of international repercussions.
• Eroding U.S. Credibility: The U.S.’s unwavering support for Israel, even in the face of documented human rights violations, has tarnished its reputation as a defender of democracy and human rights. This double standard fuels anti-American sentiment globally and undermines U.S. legitimacy in mediating conflicts elsewhere.
• Stalling Peace Efforts: By consistently siding with Israel, the U.S. has sabotaged numerous opportunities for progress in the peace process. Palestinian aspirations for statehood and self-determination remain unfulfilled, while the conflict deepens.
A Pattern of Bias and Complicity
The U.S.’s repeated use of its veto power in favor of Israel highlights a clear bias rooted in geopolitical interests, domestic political pressure, and the influence of pro-Israel lobbying groups like AIPAC. While many American officials justify these vetoes as support for an ally, they fail to acknowledge the human cost of enabling Israel’s occupation and aggression.
The Need for Accountability
The U.S.’s veto record on Palestine represents a moral and political failure. It is a stark reminder that justice and international law are often subordinated to political expediency and strategic alliances. To foster a just and lasting peace, the international community must hold all parties accountable, including Israel, and challenge the U.S.’s role in perpetuating this unjust status quo.
The question remains: How long will the world allow a single nation’s veto to block justice and deny the Palestinian people their fundamental rights? The answer lies in the collective will of the global community to confront this imbalance and demand an end to the era of unaccountable power.
A psychopathic society is one where empathy is systematically eroded, moral accountability is discarded, and violence and domination are celebrated as virtues. In such societies, the traits of psychopathy—lack of remorse, dehumanization of others, and ruthless pursuit of self-interest—are not just tolerated but institutionalized. When we reflect on the current state of global politics, few examples illustrate this phenomenon more clearly than the ongoing actions of the Israeli state.
Psychopathic societies thrive on collective delusion. They construct narratives that justify systemic oppression and normalize violence. In Israel, the dehumanization of Palestinians has been deeply ingrained, perpetuated by political rhetoric, media propaganda, and societal conditioning. From labeling entire communities as “terrorists” to reducing human lives in Gaza to mere collateral damage, the language of supremacy and disregard for human suffering has become a societal norm.
A defining characteristic of a psychopathic society is the ability to commit atrocities while simultaneously viewing oneself as the victim. In Israel, the narrative of self-defense is invoked to justify the indiscriminate killing of civilians, the bombing of homes, and the destruction of infrastructure in Gaza. This twisted justification is amplified by the media, where the victims are often portrayed as aggressors, and those committing the violence are cast as heroes or reluctant participants forced into action.
Psychopathic societies also reward and glorify violence. In Israel, far-right politicians openly call for genocidal policies, such as erasing Gaza or ethnically cleansing Palestinians, and are met with applause rather than condemnation. Soldiers who carry out brutal acts are celebrated, while those who speak out against the occupation are vilified. This normalization of cruelty is not just a feature of governance but is deeply embedded in the societal psyche.
What makes this even more alarming is the complicity of the global community. Psychopathic societies often rely on the silence, support, or indifference of others to sustain their actions. The Israeli state enjoys unwavering support from powerful allies, even as its policies towards Palestinians grow more extreme. This international backing reinforces the impunity with which it operates, further entrenching its psychopathic tendencies.
To call out psychopathic societies is not an act of hate; it is a call to restore humanity. It is a demand to recognize and reject systems that dehumanize, oppress, and destroy. Israel’s actions towards Palestinians are not just a political issue; they are a moral crisis that challenges the conscience of the world.
If we fail to confront and dismantle psychopathic societies, we risk normalizing their traits on a global scale. The question is not just about what is happening in Israel and Palestine but about what kind of world we are willing to accept. Silence in the face of injustice is not neutrality—it is complicity. The first step in countering a psychopathic society is to name it, expose its mechanisms, and demand accountability, no matter how powerful the perpetrators may be.
The time to act is now—before the world becomes a mirror of the very psychopathy we claim to abhor.
The tragedy of genocide has plagued human history, manifesting as one of the darkest aspects of human behavior—organized, deliberate attempts to eradicate entire communities, races, or ethnic groups. In recent decades, the global community has proclaimed “never again” countless times, yet these atrocities persist. What sets the contemporary era apart is the horrifying reality that some genocides are not hidden in the shadows but unfold before the eyes of the world in real time, with the ongoing Israeli assault on Gaza standing as one of the most televised and documented cases of mass suffering in history.
Gaza, home to over 2 million Palestinians, has often been described as the world’s largest open-air prison, with its inhabitants subjected to military occupation, systematic blockade, and repeated large-scale military assaults. The scale of devastation during Israel’s military campaigns, particularly in recent months, has brought accusations of genocidal intent from human rights organizations, scholars, and political observers. Entire neighborhoods have been obliterated, families wiped out, and critical infrastructure—hospitals, schools, and water systems—reduced to rubble.
What distinguishes this tragedy is the omnipresence of cameras and social media. Videos of bombings, destroyed homes, and the lifeless bodies of children circulate widely, evoking international outrage and despair. Journalists, activists, and civilians trapped in Gaza have turned their phones into tools of testimony, capturing the raw brutality of the conflict. Despite this unprecedented visibility, the international response remains paralyzed, reflecting the enduring failure of global powers and institutions to prevent or halt genocide when geopolitical interests are at play.
As scholars Raphael Lemkin and others have defined genocide—not only the killing of individuals but the destruction of a way of life—it becomes increasingly difficult to view the destruction of Gaza as anything less than an attempt to erase the Palestinian people’s existence in this besieged territory. The systematic targeting of civilians, the destruction of homes and cultural sites, and the language of dehumanization directed at Palestinians suggest a chilling intent to eliminate them as a people.
The situation in Gaza forces us to confront uncomfortable truths: What does “Never Again” truly mean when genocide unfolds live on our screens? How do we reconcile the ubiquity of evidence with the inaction of those in power? Gaza is not merely a humanitarian crisis; it is a test of the global conscience. And right now, the world is failing that test.
For those who believe in justice and human dignity, there is no neutral ground. Genocide thrives on silence and complicity. The voices of the oppressed, amplified by technology, demand accountability. If we fail to act, history will judge not only the perpetrators but all of us who stood by as the most televised genocide unfolded before our very eyes.
“We will look back and say, ‘Why did we not do more earlier?” Amnesty’s director tells Zeteo.
By PREM THAKKER, DEC 05, 2024
A young Palestinian man walks in the rubble following Israeli airstrikes on Khan Yunis, Gaza, on April 7, 2024. Photo by Ahmad Hasaballah/Getty Images
Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, Amnesty Internationalsaid for the first time on Wednesday, calling on countries, especially those with influence over Israel, such as the US and Germany, to take action to bring the violence to an end.
“The Palestinian people will not recover from this in our lifetimes as a people, and we’re failing to call it what it is,” Amnesty International executive director Paul O’Brien told Zeteo.
“I think there’s this misunderstanding that it’s impossible to watch a genocide unfolding before your eyes. But that is precisely what is happening, and I am convinced that we will look back in years to come and say, ‘Why did we not do more earlier?’” he added.
Amnesty International reached its conclusion after examining Israel’s actions and statements over a nine-month period from Oct. 7, 2023, and early July and interviewing more than 200 people, including Palestinian victims of Israeli air strikes, displacement, and detention; local authorities in Gaza; and healthcare and aid workers.
“Here in Deir al-Balah, it’s like an apocalypse,” Mohammed, a 42-year-old father of three, was quoted by Amnesty as saying. “There is no room for you to pitch a tent; you have to set it up near the coast… You have to protect your children from insects, from the heat, and there is no clean water, no toilets, all while the bombing never stops. You feel like you are subhuman here.”
Loved ones and relatives mourn as the bodies of Palestinians killed in an Israeli attack are prepared for a funeral in Deir Al-Balah, Gaza, on June 18, 2024. Photo by Ashraf Amra/Anadolu via Getty Images
Israel’s Claims Are ‘Not Credible’
Amnesty’s intensive 296-page report covers everything from airstrikes and aid sieges to agricultural decimation and destruction of cultural and religious sites. On multiple occasions, Amnesty notes, the organization shared its findings with Israeli authorities but received no substantive response.
The Israeli government has repeatedly balked at charges of genocide, claiming it takes great efforts to protect civilians while Hamas deliberately puts Palestinians in danger. The US has made similar defenses, and, when pressed, often defaults to its line that “Israel has a right to defend itself.”
Amnesty found such claims are “not credible,” saying that the presence of Hamas does not absolve Israel from its obligation to avoid indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks.
From “the clear pattern of causing intergenerational harm by dropping bombs on residential areas at night where children, infants, parents and grandparents are sleeping,” to “the constant forced movements of populations that are already traumatized by having been displaced and then attacking them once they have been moved,” O’Brien said it is “absolutely not the case” that Israel’s violence can be “understood exclusively as an attempt to defeat Hamas.”
Palestinians inspect the rubble after the Israeli army hit a UN school sheltering thousands of people in Gaza’s Nuseirat Refugee Camp on June 6, 2024. Photo by Ali Jadallah/Anadolu via Getty Images
Amnesty reviewed 15 Israeli airstrikes between Oct. 7, 2023, and April 20, 2024, that killed and wounded hundreds of civilians and found no evidence that any of the strikes were directed at a military objective.
Humanitarian workers meanwhile told Amnesty that Israel repeatedly failed to support aid distribution – and at times targeted workers who had coordinated with Israel.
One worker told Amnesty their organization actually chose not to even try notifying the Israeli government of their movements, as Palestinian staff actually feared that would put them at a higher risk. “Of course, they don’t think it will stop Israel. On the contrary, it may make them more of a target.”
Citing such evidence, Amnesty said there is “sufficient basis” to conclude that Israel has committed several acts “with the specific intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza” – a finding the human rights group said fits thelegal definition of genocide.
Unlike in many other cases of genocide, O’Brien noted, the expression of such intent in Israel has come from top officials. Of 102 dehumanizing and genocide-inciting statements from Israeli officials Amnesty identified over nine months, 22 were made by senior officials in charge of managing Israel’s violent campaign.
Last month, the International Criminal Courtissued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant for war crimes. An International Court of Justice case led by South Africa accusing Israel of genocide has had several nations — including Spain, Ireland, and Belgium — join. The ICJ has ordered Israel to prevent acts of genocide (which Israel has since continued to flout) while the case proceeds.
The Israeli military has killed at least 44,532 Palestinians, injured at least 105,538, and displaced an estimated 90% of people in Gaza since the war began. The death and injury toll is feared to be a drastic undercount due to decimated health and tracking capabilities, and thousands missing in the rubble.
With its conclusion, Amnesty International now joins an ever-burgeoning list of people and organizations who have found Israel to be committing acts of genocide against Palestinians.
These include:
• UN Special Rapporteurs
• Holocaust historian and author of “The United States and the Nazi Holocaust” Barry Trachtenberg
• Israeli-American Holocaust and genocide professor Omer Bartov
• Israeli Holocaust historian Amos Goldberg
• Co-founder of Human Rights Watch and Holocaust survivor Aryeh Neier
• The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security
